Crown of England.

I am sure a number of you have noticed the Independence for Scotland Parties campaign on SM to not allow the Stone of Destiny to be removed from Scotland for King Charles’s coronation. If not I attach the link.

https://www.isp.scot/keep-the-stone-of-destiny-in-scotland/

Reading through some of the replies from MSPs one thing has become apparent, these people do not know their history, they only know what they learned at school from history books written by English historians and approved by Mininster of Education down in Westminster…….enough said!

Now we have the facts and I say facts because now researchers in Scotland and other parts of the world have in their hands not just The Claim of Right document but also all the papers adhering to it, of which there are many!

Some MSPs and MPs believe or want to believe because it fits their agenda that in 1603 the Crowns we’re unified. Evidence now shows they were not!

Why? because what they stood for was not compatible, the Scottish Crown does not stand for a King or Queen being Monarch over the land, the people are Sovereign. No King of Scotland ever was, even before the Union, according to The Claim of Right. Scotland never ceded its land to England. Queen Ann was quite miffed about this because she wanted to wear both Crowns, and was left with only the aspiration that one day the two would be joined legally, they never were!

Only Unionist MSPs and MPs use the term King or Queen of Scotland, historians and Westminster itself rightly now use Queen or King of Scots for that is the proper Legal title.

Both the SNP and the Greens publically say they don’t believe in the Monarchy for Scotland, the ISP campaign regarding the Stone of Destiny is a way of showing this…….but will they?